Wootan and Liodice both make very good
arguments. Wootan does a good job explaing why there should be strict
food regulation and Liodice does a good job explaining why there
should not be strict food regulation. For me though I like Liodice's
argumentation better. I like it because Liodice goes to the very
basics and starts his way up from there. Starting with the basic
human rights of freedom of speech and how there should be no
regulation that hinders anyone's freedom of speech just to solve a
problem. Then from there he talks about people will not be
intimidated especially the ones who recognize personal and parental
responsibility and other values. Which I think is true since it is
the parents who buys the food for their children so it is the parents
responsibility and not the companys who promote their food. Overall I
agree with Liodice's argumentation about protecting freedom of
speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment